Some people think that they achieve success by being like others, but others perfer to be different. which do you think is better?
Hectic life has a tremendous impact on people's behaviors. Some individuals like to have the most common characters to succeed. From my vantage point. I believe that persons should be different from others humans in order to survive. I feel this way for the following reasons.
To begin with, having different features helps individuals to improve Their future. They could enhance their life in many realms. For instance, all students are studying in school and the grades could differentiate between the hard work and less effort students. Some hard work students vary from others by having hobbies or advanced experience in physical activities. These teenage people could have great opportunities by having a scholarship after graduating from school. They could continue their education in big universities because some companies like their hobbies. They will save much of money and effort. As a result, having different features could improve people's life and education.
Secondly, being various from others could enhance people's job. For instance, my father was an employee in a famous firm for a computer's technology. He was work as a regular worker. He tried to finish his education in IT in order to have high information in his field. He traveled to Germany and studied many courses about his specialist. He got many certificates about the computer's knowledge and how to deal with common problems in computer firms. When he came back for his work. His director like his experience because he did not have many employees who have certificates about these subjects. He decided to hire him as a manager and with a high salary. Consequently, people could improve their job by being different from others.
To wrap it up, contemplating for all aforesaid reasons. Being different from others could have many benefits than other alternatives
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'computers'' or 'computer's'?
Suggestion: computers'; computer's
... was an employee in a famous firm for a computers technology. He was work as a regular wo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to have high information in his field. He traveled to Germany and studied many co...
^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...died many courses about his specialist. He got many certificates about the compute...
^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'computers'' or 'computer's'?
Suggestion: computers'; computer's
...ist. He got many certificates about the computers knowledge and how to deal with common p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 298.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21140939597 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75283369079 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553691275168 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.1344086022 55% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0272438888 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 62.12 100.406767564 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 11.92 20.6045352989 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.52 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.88709677419 266% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17009673818 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543626627804 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725201418324 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137183832187 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452336419495 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.0537634409 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.