Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with them more often. What do you think?
Our relationships are mainly affected by not only the quality of our behavior but also the duration of our communications. In this regard, some people think that it is better to stay with others for a long time in order to build a perfect relationship, however, others disagree. In my own perspective, I do believe that if we want to be successful in any relationship, we should spend sufficient time with our partners because of two main reasons which are elaborated in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the more time we spend with our friends, the deeper our relationship will be. In fact, people make friend based on their similarities, therefore, as we find more equal issues to speak, our connections become more strong, therefore, by spending enough time being in contact with others, we can be more familiar with others character and can find more similar things. My life is a perfect example of this idea. I had numerous friends when I was at university because I am generally a sociable man and can easily trigger a conversation with unknown people. However, I have lost most of them after just 2 years of my graduation. This is just because of the low amount of time that I spent in last two years with them. I can remember that we stayed in a small room with a lot of my friends dealing with our projects and doing our homework, as a result, we have made a perfect relationship at those time. But now, we rarely visit each other and consequently, our communication becomes too weak.
Secondly, being in constant contact with others show them our loyalty and mentally have a positive effect on our relationship. In fact, there is a general belief that under no circumstances should not we leave our friends, this demonstrates how important our friend is and consequently can strengthen our communications. For instance, I had a friend from my high school and we had perfect memories with each other. The key parameter that influences our relationship is our loyalty. We were beside each other even in terrible situations and I solved most of my problems with the help of him. Therefore, he is more resemblance to my brother rather than my friend. He himself has a similar opinion toward our relationships which is mainly related to the quality and quantity of years spending with each other. In this way, I think that the duration of our communication can enhance the quality of our relationships.
In sum, above from aforementioned explanation, it is obvious that I think having a perfect relationship is exactly in line with the time that we spend on it. This is because of them. That's why we should act in this way to improve our communications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e spend on it. This is because of them. Thats why we should act in this way to improv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 82.0 43.0788530466 190% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7650862069 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96656879787 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480603448276 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5148195769 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405077611271 0.236089414692 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129623221186 0.076458572812 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697208070319 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294494596992 0.150856017488 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245478953057 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.