Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with them more often. What do you think?
In our modern era that they are varieties of views and attitudes, some people have this view that it is vital for people to communicate with each other very closely learning how to deal with different opinions and characteristics yet, others have the opposite points of view and are opponent; in their opinion, it is good for people to be distant some times because by this way their partners find out how mattering they are. I totally hold the first view and assert having a close relationship is important to us and we can discover many concepts of relationship from it. I expand on my notions in the following paragraphs.
Mt first and foremost reason is that by close relationship we can build a deep relationship due to the fact that we have learned how to deal with predicaments with each other and how to react to each other in different circumstances; in addition, by this means we can become ready for social too because if we learn how to communicate with our partner that has different points of view, we will be able to communicate with society. Besides being away from each other may be harmful to us since in this way maybe our partner starts to neglect us instead of being aware of our importance. Therefore; to have a deep relationship it is better to stick to each other.
The latter reason that I have is that why we always want to run away from our problems? Why we do not stay and fix them? I personally prefer instead of becoming frustrated and escape from difficulties, if I have a problem in my relationship, I stay and arrange it, a genius person always behaves like this. In my country statistics shows that when partners encounter difficulties they just want to be far away from each other, after a while when they reunion, they have good relationship at first because they are missing each other, but again anytime they face another obstacle due to the fact that they do not learn how to adjust the situation, they are falling apart and facing bigger problems. Instead of that at the beginning, if partners comprehend that they have a relationship and they are responsible for every aspect of it, they will never let it go to be fixed itself.
To make a long story short, instead of running away and pray for our partner missing us, it is crucial to learn every point of our partner's personality to deal with problems and access a stable relationship. In another word, a relationship is like a flower needing care to grow and flourish, if we let it alone, it will become perish. Also, a deep relationship needs wise sides having strong personalities to have each other backs in the world modern hectic lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 587, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...stead of being aware of our importance. Therefore; to have a deep relationship it is bett...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62765957447 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70607936876 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455319148936 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 682.2 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.1344086022 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 128.813046779 48.9658058833 263% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 155.357142857 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5714285714 20.6045352989 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.476695625444 0.236089414692 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162367877251 0.076458572812 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902762418129 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31234508972 0.150856017488 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864377525249 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.002688172 280% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.0537634409 151% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.