Students in a university club want to help others, but
they can only choose one project a year, which one of
the following is the best?
help those students in a nearby primary school
with reading and mathematics
help people who cannot afford to build or rent a
home to build a house
visit and assist elderly people with daily tasks
Without a shadow of a doubt, it is only by helping others and having each other's back that could human beings fulfill their distinctions as superior creators. However, an unanswered question in this area is that whether people should support pivotal rudiment demands such as an ineffective educational basis and homelessness to ameliorate or people susceptible to perils like lonely elderlies. Despite the arguments asserting that helping the aged generation or assisting homeless people is of great importance, I believe otherwise, maintaining that giving a hand to students in primary school to achieve their further goals is more critical. In the subsequent paragraphs, I will develop these ideas through two compelling reasons.
First and foremost, the tremendous implications of a prosperous academic infrastructure in schools are crystal clear in every society's future. As a matter of fact, this educational accomplishment arises from a well-made basis which can be heavily influenced by university clubs that tend to help their students. Regarding the fact that these pupils aim to help primary schools students with their reading and mathematics poss excellent education and knowledge, it is clear to see why this improves professional level in schools, and also help students in better grasping the lessons. Moreover, the future of society is in the hands of current students; therefore, it should be considered as a crucial matter. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my personal experience. In summers, I used to teach mathematics in rural sections of the city, which its equipment is not worth mentioning. However, two years after that summer, I encountered one of the students I had. She appreciated me for what I had taught them and told me she was attending one of the best universities in that city due to her math grade. Needless to say, the better the teaching environment and basis, the more erudite students in future generations.
Another reason to be mentioned is that learning from others undergoing is a beneficial approach to exploit them. To put this in a more vivid picture, students from university clubs can share their experiences with students in primary schools and become a guide for them in their way. On the contrary, students who do not have anyone to ask about the merits and demerits of the route they have taken could confront a myriad of arduous circumstances. Consequently, students with leaders have a vivid roadmap that seeds the plant of a more confident personality and an organized mindset. My experience is a compelling example of this. Back in high school, I consulted with people around me who were in various fields. As a result, that gave me a bright picture of every major and led me to the one I was talented in, in the long run.
Reflecting upon all reasons mentioned above, I firmly believe that pupils club who help other students in adjacent primary schools with a variety of their curriculums have the best approach for contributing to helping others. It is highly recommended to research to gain insight into the people’s viewpoint of this question.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2641.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09845559846 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93398760554 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544401544402 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2469819479 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.045454545 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335288669895 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805345251027 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760697207485 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206488713106 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411055772044 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.