For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Now a day we live in modern society, people compete with each other to become successful. Someone wants to be well in job maybe others want to be good in school and so on. Doing well and be the best is now very hard cause everyone tries more than limits and boundaries. To look precisely on how to do well at the job, we can discuss many factors. There are several opinions about this subject, some people, including me, believe that for success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people and have good relationships with others is important, while others consistently think that studying hard in school is the key of being successful in the job. In this essay, I am going to explain three potential reasons.
First of all, when you have a good relationship with people you have an opportunity to meet new persons who are expert in their field and can help you with your projects. If you just work with constant people, you will never able to develop your carrier even yourself. For instance, when I was in high school, I went to the company as an intern. I was a shy person so I couldn't talk to my bosses and solve my problems and I see who are social and make circles rapidly improve his or her position. Since then I started to put my shy away and I gain many experiences and skills.
Secondly, the ability to relate well to people brings you new connections. Maybe a junior worker in the company doesn't have a direct relationship with the bosses, but when you connect with others, in the end, you see you are connected to high-level bosses. What I want to say is that these new connections bring you brilliant positions and opportunities even customers. So, just by seating in front of your table and be in touch with the same people you wouldn't able to flourish and prosper.
Finally, the last thing I want to consider is that one of the skills that are important when you work with others is the ability to work on a team. Today in many companies most of the projects can't be handled single handily, so managers usually assign work to a group of people. In such working environment although personally ability is still highly appreciated, it always the team comes first. And being able to relate well to the group members can help you with that.
To wrap it up, if we want to see a successful upcoming generation, we should encourage people and authorities to also focus on communicational skills for children rather than just persuading them to study hard in schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...y as an intern. I was a shy person so I couldnt talk to my bosses and solve my problems...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s. Maybe a junior worker in the company doesnt have a direct relationship with the bos...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...nd be in touch with the same people you wouldnt able to flourish and prosper. Finally,...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... in many companies most of the projects cant be handled single handily, so managers ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52549889135 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54569982671 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529933481153 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5591302824 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.05 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.55 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268924982591 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770706450306 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975412608092 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146071443707 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116962529441 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.