Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Education has been a hot point in society for long time. There is no doubts of debates about whether or not teachers are more likely to be represented than before. In my opinion, it is true that people realize the more importance of teachers than before.
First of all, people pay more attention to education and realize that it is more and more important for their children. Traditionally, parents had less expectation for their children than now. People always ignored the education of children and were busying at their work. Some proposed that their children still could making a life, regardless of teachers’ advice. For instance, carpenters would teach their children how to deal with wood and regard this type of ability as a way to make a living. But now, with the development of technology, advanced technology is required more knowledge to solve problems and parents now wish their children to receive high quality education. So they more appreciate teachers since they hope teachers help them educate their children to become elites.
Secondly, another fact should be taken into consideration is that teachers are more responsible for their students. Recently, with the completion of education system, a teacher could in charge of a small group students instead of numbers of students. It reduces the pressure of teachers and divides their concentration more on each student. If the students were burgeon, the teachers would be gardeners. The more gardeners take care of the burgeon, the stronger these burgeon would be. In turn, society are more likely adept to accept their important roles to public because they could cultivate elites than before.
In conclusion, teachers enjoy higher acceptance than before. That is not only because society think highly of education and teachers but also society are satisfied more than before for their education achievements.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'There are no doubts'?
Suggestion: There are no doubts
...n a hot point in society for long time. There is no doubts of debates about whether or not teacher...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...me. There is no doubts of debates about whether or not teachers are more likely to be represen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...roposed that their children still could making a life, regardless of teachers' ad...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...eacher could in charge of a small group students instead of numbers of students. It redu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'burgeoned'.
Suggestion: burgeoned
...e on each student. If the students were burgeon, the teachers would be gardeners. The m...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...deners. The more gardeners take care of the burgeon, the stronger these burgeon would be. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 303.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23102310231 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70637526965 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547854785479 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9127165937 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0555555556 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299169083775 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109371417848 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713451318154 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214798350941 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288905294028 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.