Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Due to the rapid growth in the development of technology, we humans are relying on the machines to such an extend that if the technology is to disappear then we humans will not be able to survive at all. Technologically advanced mobility services, phones/tablets and televisions occupy us daily and keeps us busy for hours that we forget to get ourselves physically active or be mentally alert to things.
Since the development of cars, motorcycles and other mobile services such as hover boards and motorized scooters caused we humans to become lazy and made us incapable of travelling long distances on foot. Back in the olden days, people used to walk far distances which was time consuming of course however, it maintained their health and kept them physically fit. Because there were very few means of transportation, people usually traveled on foot to places. Nowadays, we have cars, motorcycles and even hover boards that restricts our ability to be physically active by walking or running. Therefore, we have increased problems relating to obesity and other diseases. Even an average life of a person can live nowadays is not more than 65 whereas, back in the old times people used to live for more than 100 years.
Also, children and teenagers nowadays are glued to their phones and tablets to such an extent that they do not realize that their mother is calling them or even they forget to eat. These technological advancement are not only impacting adults, teenagers and children but also it is impacting young children aged 2 to 5 year old. Instead of playing they want to sit for hours playing games or watching shows. When I was growing up the technology was not that advanced and we did not know what cell phone is and the only fun thing that we knew about was television and computer. My mother made sure that I play outside more than just watch T.V. shows or play games. This made me and my brother socially alert and be responsive and kept us physically fit and so our minds were fresh.
Technology has not only limited our physically activities but it also invented various kinds of surgeries that people can do not only to cure them but also to make themselves look good appearance wise. For example, Michael Jackson was a famous hip hop singer but he also wanted to modify his appearance by changing skin colour. Because of that he did look white but it also created additional health issues because he misused the service. Many people get different kinds of surgeries like getting their cheekbones lifted that led them to look like monsters instead of looking beautiful.
Technology has not only made negative impacts in our lives but it also made positive changes like finding cure for cancer and different kinds of treatment and surgeries to resolve an issue. Or made our lives much more easier with automobiles and other inventions. However, it made us so much dependent on the technology that it is also jeopardizing our health physically and mentally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ans are relying on the machines to such an extend that if the technology is to disappear ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun means seems to be countable; consider using: 'few means'.
Suggestion: few means
...physically fit. Because there were very few means of transportation, people usually trave...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...esolve an issue. Or made our lives much more easier with automobiles and other inventions....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h more easier with automobiles and other inventions. However, it made us so much ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 34.0 13.8261648746 246% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63826817142 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516634050881 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5946074179 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.19047619 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167086355528 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492888673573 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042136507438 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927498471259 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069467424048 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.002688172 210% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.