Three days at home with longer hours of work better than five days at work.
Job, as we all know, for the majority of people, plays a dominant role in their life. Due to the paramount importance of the job, efforts for elevating its effectiveness have always been among the top priorities of sociologists. In this regard, many people believe that having a job that required a person to do her or his job three days a week for long hours is far better than having a job that a person has to work for five days a week. Contrary to common belief, I believe that working for five days a week provides numerous advantages like better consistency and leisure time. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that having five days for working is favorable is related to the job consistency aspect. Undoubtedly, for achieving success in every task, it is necessary to do it continually. Without a doubt, one noticeable result of consistency is the focus. A concentrated employee is far more acceptable for most of the companies. Although many critics may challenge this opinion and debate that employees who have some days for themselves in a week have much more time for themselves, employees who experience both circumstances- being at work for longer hours or more days- show their support toward the latter. As well as, based on statistics, this method for working brings better concentrate on work processes both for company and employees. A person knows better about how his work process and can manage it properly if every day being at work.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is experiencing much more qualified spare time. Whenever people have a balanced time for work, they can revive themselves better in their free time. Moreover, scientifically speaking, extra leisure time brings tediousness for people. In other words, having three days at home is considered as exceeding holidays that make the work efficiency not only worsen but also cause bored feelings in employees` temper. In other words, employees can enjoy their hobby better and make their mind fresher in a balanced situation. Take my personal experience as an example. A couple of years ago, I was hired in an organization that had a rule. Every employee had to be at work for three days a week and then had the same days as off work. Surprisingly, despite the fact that I had expected to enjoy my free time when I was at work, I wanted it became over sooner, and when I was at home, I was upset because of the extra time I had. What would have happened if I had had another system for my job? I surely believe that I could be more energetic and sufficient.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that neither extra free time nor excessive working time not influential for a person`s efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r mind fresher in a balanced situation. Take my personal experience as an exampl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, as to, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2349.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83333333333 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8060020153 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506172839506 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6785790647 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331839484961 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916485831743 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114818503114 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194091482723 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887568791999 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.