This topic has been offered at least 2 times in the past 10 months: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. One quality that a successful leader should have is to make decisions quickly. When a leader takes too much time to make decisions, he will be seen as ineffective to the people he leads.
Without any shadow of a doubt, in these days' market, technology is improving so fast that nobody can stop it. In this regard, in the assessment of a company' being reliable, nothing is more important than its manager's validity. Therefore, from my viewpoint, that a manager makes a fast decision is of importance because the company's employees are the first group that should believe the company's validity. Supports for this idea are manifold; nonetheless, two of which are elaborated upon hereunder nevertheless.
To begin with, consider leaders who take a quick decision as "frontward managers" and "backward managers" for the otherwise definition. Not allowing whose employees to become under the squeeze of any stresses, from employees' point of view, frontward managers are more likely to be trustworthy. It means that by making a fast, rational decision, they tend to keep the company's space calm. In the other word, they have believed that their leader shoulders the responsibility. In contrast, working for a backward manager, employees even cannot be sure about that whether they can have their work during hard situations that the company experiences or not. This problem had happened to the Nokia, the "shark" supplier of the world mobile phone. As reported by the media, a large number of employees were downsized due to the belated decision-making of the company's manager.
Moreover, it has been shown that, in the giant companies, like Google and Microsoft, the more frontward managers a company has, the more convenient its employees can be. In fact, frontward managers tend to help their company become on the upper level of the competition with its competitors, indicating that their company will receive more income, in comparison with their competitors. Therefore, wanting their company receives more money—which will be great for them as well, frontward managers' employees are less prone to give up, or even do not work as much as they can so that. Backward managers, on the other hand, because they are not fast enough, their employees tend to not care about what is happening for the company. In the other word, having no motivator, backward managers' employees tend to wait until their leader makes a decision and do not try to have a portion of their company's success.
To sum up, with all taken into account, I do believe that a leader's ability to make a fast decision in different circumstances that its company encounters is one of the paramount characteristics that a leader should have. A leader's becoming trustworthy and having the foci of whose employees are two reasons which are mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...mobile phone. As reported by the media, a large number of employees were downsized due to the bel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...taken into account, I do believe that a leaders ability to make a fast decision in diff...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, in contrast, in fact, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 430.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20465116279 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99039746766 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.94265232975 344% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4195635771 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143971749553 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055133091644 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058514413124 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114574713082 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063111591859 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.