TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
There is no doubt that complexity in the social and political conditions pose that teacher get eager to make their views known to students. This brings up an arguable question regarding to whether it is permitted to teachers express their point of view concerning with political and social issues or not. Some individuals reject this stance, whereas others buttress it. As far as I'm concerned, I feel that the idea of making political and social view known to students in classroom must be prohibited. The reason behind this standpoint are discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, by speaking about politic in the classroom, teachers will affect on the students’ viewpoint, which create some problems for them. In fact, each adult has a specific point of view at various topics in their own country’s politics. Some juveniles oppose to the governmental tasks that political group perform, whereas others support them. If a teacher describes his or her views to the student in the classroom, it will lead on that adults will become confused. Moreover, by discussing their perspective at school will lead onto the increasing hostility amount their classmates. For instance, consider a teacher in the school who thinks that his country’s president is not a good politician. When some students observe that their teacher’s perspective is consistent with them, they force other students, who do not believe them, to agree. Consequently, they start to struggle with one another, which will create a sense of hatred among their classmate which in turn, influence on the students ‘relationship with each other.
The second and important reason that support my standpoint is that educator' and teachers' job are only to educate people. Indeed, teachers at school should merely give information related to class material, rather than elaborating on social or political views because people send their children to the school and university in order to broaden their children' knowledge. Furthermore, educators do not provide any knowledge regarding to the political and social problems, because young people are able to gain information in particular time such as in social and political campaign in which they can freely exchange idea not only with other people but also with politicians and sociologists. Hence, education and teaching are only thing that are of paramount importance for future generation and teachers and educators should concentrate on them in the classroom, since one of the responsibility of teachers are to educate children.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned factors, I would contend that teachers should not be allowed to express their political and social standpoint to the students, because they impact on juveniles, causing issues in the school and their accountability are educating children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
..., whereas others buttress it. As far as Im concerned, I feel that the idea of maki...
^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...politic in the classroom, teachers will affect on the students' viewpoint, which cre...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, no doubt, speaking about, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41704035874 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00633100331 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513452914798 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9284832451 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.222222222 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.45110844103 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301301932738 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100717089989 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509000027019 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184864306142 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548333672288 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.