TPO-30
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Humans have been working since time immemorial to sustain their lives. Some people prefer to work three days a week, whereas others work five days a week. Both of the schedules have their own advantages. As far as I'm concerned, working three days a week for long hours is better. I feel this way for three rationales which I can explain from hereunder.
To begin with, a shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees will feel more rested and alert. As a result, there will be fewer errors in work which inturn can cause a hike in the profit. Moreover, companies can hire more employees for the rest of the days in the week which consequently benefited the economy of the country. For instance, in my brother's company, a survey is conducted to know the economic growth of the firm from 2000-2020. An overall spike in profit is noted after 2010 and the prime reason behind this victory was a short-workweek of their workers. On top of that, there is a drastic rise in the number of employees as well. This particular example shows that companies have fewer overworked and error-prone employees due to this schedule.
Next, the free time of employees can improve the quality of their life by spending extra time with their families, pursuing a private interest, and enjoying leisure activities. This can provide much relaxation and easiness in life. When I gave birth to my first kid, my husband selected the three-day job to spend more time with our son. It was much help for me and this created a deep bond between my son and my husband. In addition, when he grew, they will spend time in parks and beaches and we went for long drives. Those times are the best times in our life to cherish. Additionally, my husband studied an online course in his off days and now he got promoted in his job. A 5-day work is a beneficiary schedule for bachelors because they don't have much to do rather than at weekends.
Finally, less workweek can save transportation costs and hence less pollution to the ecosystem. Everyone relies upon their car to commute that can add up with air, noise, and sound pollution.
All in all, by considering all the points into account, I vehemently assure that working for 3 days is better than a long 5-day schedule. It can not only ameliorate the company's profit, but also can enhance the quality of life by the workers and their surroundings as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...s have their own advantages. As far as Im concerned, working three days a week fo...
^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ween my son and my husband. In addition, when he grew, they will spend time in pa...
^^
Line 5, column 745, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ary schedule for bachelors because they dont have much to do rather than at weekends...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orkers and their surroundings as well.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, i feel, in addition, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71800947867 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55641958671 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561611374408 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1353428533 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9583333333 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5833333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261602339367 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740724482649 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828975409389 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143502751357 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103828196158 0.0645574589148 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.