tpo 35
The reading and the listening passage have a debate on originality of "voynich manuscript". The writer puts forward 3 main theory which are refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer proposes that the book contain scientific or secret concepts in the form of complicated signs. In addition, similarity between plant pictures on it with Ascham's book declares that author of book is Ascham. The speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to him, original version of Ascham's book does not have any similarity with manuscript and there is no reason that Ascham puts coded secret documents.
The second point offered by the writer is that it is possible the manuscript evole meaningless signs only because someone like Kelley who had magical power wanted to sell it with high profit. The speaker casts doubt on this claim by saying that there was no need for Kelley to write this manuscript for money because magical power was very easy way to earn money for him. Thus, it seems uncredible reason.
Lastly, the writer suggests that it is possible that Voynich himself has write the manuscript himself to sell it by a consideration price because he was familiar with the characteristic of original documents. As a result, it was easy for him to copy a new one of them with no real meaning! On contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. He explains that the ink of that book belongs to 400 years before Voynich's time, so, it is impossible that Voynich did that fake even if he knew that technique!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...it is possible that Voynich himself has write the manuscript himself to sell it by a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, lastly, second, so, thus, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 259.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91505791506 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66504375614 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57528957529 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2812245438 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.083333333 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 86.8835125448 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.