TPO 49. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Friends are like family members who are selected, and they play an important role in life. Some people think is it better to have a small number of friends for a long period of time while others believe that it is better to make many friends easily. In my way of thinking it is better to have a friendship with a few people for a long time because not only will the friendship be stronger, but also they can match together easier.
The first reason which should be stated here is that through the time the friendship will be sturdy. people are complex creatures whom cannot be known easily. Some people have strange behaviors that need a long period of time to be known. Also, it is not easy to trust all the community members. Many of them may emerge with a friendship appearance while they have deceived many plans to abuse their partner. Therefore, it is not a good idea to start a friendship easily, and the longer the friendship duration, the deeper and stronger the relationship. In addition, old friends usually have various similar memories and experiences like vacations, college classes, gatherings, and so on. These memories will enhance the relationship as well while new friends do not have common enjoyable experiences.
The other point which deserves some words here is that old friends have similar behavior. The people have a flexible personality. Their behavior is affected by the people around them especially friends who have many similarities and are in the same age. So, as much as the friendship take long, the friends will be like each other in their way of thinking and in their behavior. These similarities help them to match better and enjoy being with each other. On the contrary, it will not happen between people whose friendship is not long. Furthermore, if the number of friends is a lot, it will be more difficult for them to match with each other because each individual has a specific personality. Conclusively, the small gather of friends can match easier.
To summarize, it is better to have a small number of friends over a long period of time. It helps them to have a robust relationship and match to each other easier, so they will enjoy being with together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- TPO 34. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 47
- TPO 45. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 60
- TPO 26, Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 70
- TPO 32 80
- TPO 32 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... Some people think is it better to have a small number of friends for a long period of time while...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ve a small number of friends for a long period of time while others believe that it is better ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...the time the friendship will be sturdy. people are complex creatures whom cannot be kn...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...have strange behaviors that need a long period of time to be known. Also, it is not easy to tr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...sonality. Their behavior is affected by the people around them especially friends who have many simila...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
.... To summarize, it is better to have a small number of friends over a long period of time. It ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e a small number of friends over a long period of time. It helps them to have a robust relatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76501305483 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59887277691 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441253263708 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9098921165 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9047619048 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251035170895 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882709057544 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662757312764 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188830071175 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452980117008 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.