TPO 55
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important we can comprehand the problems and issues during projects. Needless to say, making practical communication with collegues and classmates to do the projects in the perfect way is one of the vital demands. Some people prefer to make contact about works by e-mails, while others opt to communicate in person. In my opinion, the person conection is the best way to work on projects practically. I feel in this way for tow reasons, which I wil explore in the following essay.
To begin with, person communication prevends the missunderstanding and provide better comprehand about the colleagus opinions. My personal experiance is a copeling illustration of this. When I worked on my project about designining an application for Hydrogeoloy, I needed to worked with colleage who was softwear engeenire. I sent some e-mail to explain a consept about groundwater, but he could understand it. When I met him in the university and explained the concept again for him, he totally Understanded.
The other reason pops up in my mind is that in close and person communication people can ask more quastion and also answer most of others' quastions in the short time that is mean they may save amount of time in this way. Let's imagine to students they work on projects for their calss and each of them take a responsablity for espetial part of it. They have constant times during a week for meeting. In that meeying they ask all their quastions about others outputs and solve their confusings in just 2 hours. therefore, In that way they save nomerous amount of time to do the important works about the project.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that person communication is the better way to do team work projects. This is becaus it helps to convey our mean better, and saving time buy decresing the time of sending e-mails and wating to rescive the responses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is critically important we can compre...
^^^
Line 1, column 470, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (wil) must be used with a third-person verb: 'explores'.
Suggestion: explores
...n this way for tow reasons, which I wil explore in the following essay. To begin wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I wil explore in the following essay. To begin with, person communication prev...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gain for him, he totally Understanded. The other reason pops up in my mind is t...
^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the others') or simply say ''most others''.
Suggestion: most of the others; most others
...e can ask more quastion and also answer most of others quastions in the short time that is mea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ey may save amount of time in this way. Lets imagine to students they work on projec...
^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...solve their confusings in just 2 hours. therefore, In that way they save nomerous amount ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the important works about the project. In conclusion, I strongly feel that pers...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, therefore, while, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87774294671 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89961365663 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548589341693 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4650112885 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5294117647 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298140257189 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961784632941 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560113873611 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177615925147 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034413163797 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.