TPO 55: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
It goes without saying that in today's world, one of the primary concern of students is to conduct their projects as better as possible to have a good resume and have a prosperous future. While some people believe that the students' teams should work on their project face to face, the others hold the view that communicating via e-mail is much better and leads in a better result. Personally, I concur with the former group's viewpoint. The reasons substantiating my standpoint are explored in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, in communication by e-mail, there is a chance of misunderstanding, and it may affect the quality of the students' project. To elaborate, it is crystal clear that people in face to face communication can show their emotions and transfer their meaning more clearly and precisely; however, in the written communication such as e-mail, the classmates should send the result of their research via some letters. Besides, when the students or colleagues have face to face communication, they can discuss each other and reach the best results — considering this example for driving this notion home. When I was a bachelor's degree student at the university, I had a cooperative project with one of my friends, and we would inform each other about our tasks during the week and our achievements. In one of our messages just before the project deadline, I misunderstood my responsibility and did another work. Therefore, the day when we presented our project to the professor, the project was incomplete, and we did not get the full score.
In addition, writing is a time-consuming process, which leads to a low-quality result. To elucidate, when teammates are communicating via e-mail, each time they should explain the works which they have done to each other in written form; thus, students should put a lot of time writing the materials which they can explain to each other in a short time. Therefore, they must put less time concentrating on their project, and it is resulted in decreasing the project quality. Needless to say, the more people be in the group, the more time has been squandered in this process.
As shown above, considering all the reasons and the points mentioned, one may conclude that the teammates should be in touch in person. It is because they should misrepresent their work to each other, and the writing process is to waste a colossal amount of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... is to conduct their projects as better as possible to have a good resume and have...
^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...t. Personally, I concur with the former groups viewpoint. The reasons substantiating m...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 618, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a bachelor' or simply 'bachelors'?
Suggestion: a bachelor; bachelors
...or driving this notion home. When I was a bachelors degree student at the university, I had...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97777777778 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91492540616 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.906399861 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230960560081 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782131766628 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505401084011 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135601734526 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584796728452 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.