TPO19.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
In the modern era, people are always looking for fresh news from their favorite resources. Nowadays, there are large number of resources for getting news. In this regard, some people believe that it is better to get news from different resources. However, others hold exactly the opposite point of view. As far as I am concerned, I think that it is better to check news from one reliable source. checking different sources can be a waste of time, also it would be repetitive. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint by expanding my reasons.
one significant reason that worth shed light on is that even if we had a different source of news, they all would provide the same news at the same time. Getting information from many sources does not increase our knowledge because all this information are repetitive, but they are provided by different sources. For example, last year, I subscribed a large number of news channels on my TV , and I was checking all of them. After a month, I figured out that all of these channels repeat the same news. Furthermore, I decided to unsubscribe all of them except one channel which it was my favorite, and it was quite reliable.
Another significant reason that worth mentioning is that getting informed by different news sources can be a waste of time. We can use our time more efficient. As it mentioned above, different resource of news provides the same information respectivelly. this would be a waste of time if we check a news over and over again. It would be better to choose a trustworthy source, and follow the news on it. In this way, we can take advantage of our time more profitable. For instance, last year, after unsubscribing unnecessary news channels on my tv, I spent my time on reading my favorite science books. It helped me to increase in my knowledge more than hearing to repetitive news on TV.
To sum up, I think that we would not be get-informed by following different source of news. At a same time, all news sources will publish a same news, thus, these information not only will not increase our information, but also it wastes our time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Checking
...to check news from one reliable source. checking different sources can be a waste of tim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... my viewpoint by expanding my reasons. one significant reason that worth shed ligh...
^^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. For example, last year, I subscribed a large number of news channels on my TV , and I was chec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...a large number of news channels on my TV , and I was checking all of them. After a...
^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...des the same information respectivelly. this would be a waste of time if we check a ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...is would be a waste of time if we check a news over and over again. It would be better...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...sources will publish a same news, thus, these information not only will not increase our informat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, for instance, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72386058981 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8883045516 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458445040214 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9277124592 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9047619048 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211461441859 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835140822919 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677318326275 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156662164284 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362456280819 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.