In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
In the last century the number of cars has increased. However, there are people who believe that in the next twenty years could be decrease for several reasons. I agree with this statement that vehicles in the future will be fewer for three main reasons: commuting time, sustainable life, and reducing cost of life, and in the following paragraphs I will support those ideas.
First of all, commuting activity is that people need to do every day. In big cities this activity is became a huge issue for people. More specifically, public who go and come back from home to work take them many hours every day. At this point, big cities are working in figure out how it could be a better solution on this issue. One of the things that they are working is in commute by train, subway, or bus. Those public transport reduce the number of vehicles that people need to use to go work.
Second, sustainable life is the new goal for people these days. Since people are turning in this style of life, they are using less fuel or gas car. Furthermore, car companies are looking that vehicles sale projections will decrease in consequence. Drawing my own experience, my wife and I have only one car which is share between each other, because we do not want contribute with more pollution. Thus, the number of cars should be lower in the future than it is today.
Finally, in the past the cost of life was cheaper than it is nowadays. Since people try to figure out how they could reduce expenses on their budget, the first thing that it could be an alternative is reduce highest cost. Of course, vehicles are one of the most expensive output in home budget, and reducing the number of cars in every house help to reduce the expenses every day.
In conclusion, I believe that in the future the number of cars will reduced because commute is becoming an issue for big cities, second; people are ending up in a sustainable life, and finally life is turning more expensive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 101, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ery day. In big cities this activity is became a huge issue for people. More specifica...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 484, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... number of vehicles that people need to use to go work. Second, sustainable life i...
^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...hermore, car companies are looking that vehicles sale projections will decrease in conse...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lowed', 'lowered'?
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...ion. Thus, the number of cars should be lower in the future than it is today. Final...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...hing that it could be an alternative is reduce highest cost. Of course, vehicles are o...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'reduce the highest'.
Suggestion: reduce the highest
...hing that it could be an alternative is reduce highest cost. Of course, vehicles are one of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...t in the future the number of cars will reduced because commute is becoming an issue fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, thus, in conclusion, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59259259259 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35720855501 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498575498575 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4910205099 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5555555556 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227203851693 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686974283817 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725065532543 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125514980483 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856325344104 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.