What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important.

Essay topics:

What are some important qualities of a good supervisor (boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important.

These days people spend a tremendous amount of time at workplaces and their satisfaction with a work process mainly depends on the attitude of their managers. Personally, I think that the essential characteristics of a great supervisor are his experience and his professionalism. There are a few reasons why I hold this opinion.
First of all, employees can learn a lot from their experienced bosses. A knowledgeable individual who leads a team can be incredibly helpful for inexperienced workers. This kind of person is able to teach them important features of their jobs and give them a myriad of tips which he learned in his own practice. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Right after a graduation of a college, I started working as a pharmacist in a local pharmacy. At that moment, I thought that I knew enough about my job, but in fact, I was underestimating my abilities and faced a few negative situations with customers where I did not know how to resolve them correctly. My supervisor, who worked for the pharmacy for many years took time and explained to me how to deal with angry and inpatient patients. He told me that it was better to listen to unhappy customers carefully and did not argue with them, but let them talk about their complaints as long as they wanted and promised them to do everything I could to fix a problem. I followed his advice, and as a result, I learned how to calm down furious patients and even how to make them leave the pharmacy fully satisfied with our services.
Secondly, professionalism of a boss contributes to the success of entire team since people tend to imitate their supervisors` work style and hence, to act professionally as well. Indeed, when a manager cheers his workers, treats all of them in the same way, and maintains positive work environment, employees prone to follow this attitude because it makes a work routine more pleasant and less stressful. For instance, when my head pharmacist endorses his technicians` work achievements and praises them for a nice job, they feel encouraged and strive to perform their duty in the best way, even during very busy and overwhelming days. Moreover, my boss is always on time and he never gossips about his teammates, which highly appreciated and followed by all his subordinates. Therefore, everyone in the pharmacy goes to work with pleasure and our team is the most effective one in a company.
To conclude, I strongly believe that a considerable work experience and professionalism are the hallmarks of an excellent leader. This is because we can expand our knowledge by learning from a seasoned boss, and because employees will work with effectiveness and enthusiasm under a supervision of a person with professional manners.

Average: 4.1 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...macy fully satisfied with our services. Secondly, professionalism of a boss cont...
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
... of a person with professional manners.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93776824034 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14061420848 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549356223176 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2812978487 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.105263158 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5263157895 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26315789474 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0491777263482 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0184470087537 0.076458572812 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0213741530389 0.0737576698707 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0347069532541 0.150856017488 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158557265334 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.