When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Everyone plans to create a productive project, for that he might consider all the possible aspects so that outcome will be well appreciated and widely accepted. Some people tend to prepare for their assignments by email, others consider that interpersonal communication is critical for completing the project. If I were asked I would definitely say that a successful final project would be only possible with the active in-person participation of members. My firm belief in intercommunication for the efficacy of work is for a number of reasons, and I will develop my ideas in subsequent paragraphs.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is associated with the common workplace ethic. Colleagues who collaborate personally are at an advantage because they present counterarguments that assist in their comprehension and conflict resolution. Since they are provided with the chance to discuss every bit of their project and, they resolve their mutual disagreements. As a result, they have not only achieved their goals but have proved to be an exemplary employee for the company too. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my company's experience. The previous year, a study was conducted in my company to check the effectiveness of employees' work. All the employees were divided into groups and had given a software issue to be fixed and, they were requested to submit that on a fixed date. The colleagues who participated in the preparation through in-person communication were able to fix the issue efficaciously whereas workers who interacted by email were failed to accomplish their task. When asked, the employees credited their success to the powerful discussion they had during their conflict resolution. It is clear to see that in-person communication is conducive to profitable work.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that when classmates are provided with the opportunity of face to face interaction, they produce innovative ideas that make them high achievers. This is because when people work together, they share their knowledge and work towards each other weaknesses to make them their strengths. As a result, the outcome is a collective effort. Drawing from my son's experience, last semester his science teacher gave him the project. He chose to work with his friend and presented the project together. My son was good at science, but he did not know about media presentations. Both boys worked strenuously and helped each other to overcome their weaknesses and when they presented their collective media project. Teachers were amazed by their project and they were able to achieve the highest grades in class. Had they worked together in person, would not it have possible to create a media project.
In the light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that communication between colleagues is essential for the progress of the project because they will not only discuss their disagreements but also come up with creative ideas to enhance their performances.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is critical for completing the project. If I were asked I would definitely say tha...
^^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...paragraphs. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is associated with the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 911, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...worked together in person, would not it have possible to create a media project. I...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, well, whereas, as to, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2590.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 495.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23232323232 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00769071692 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505050505051 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2821388358 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.79166666667 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263123846396 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797771408236 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466325311444 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173319791591 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324597941174 0.0645574589148 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.