When students study these days, many of them also do other things at the same time, for example, use their phones, spend time on the Internet or listen to music.
Do you agree or disagree that such activities have a bad effect on learning?
Without any shadow of a doubt, no one can stop improving technological suffs like phones as well as internet. Although they play an important role in people's lives, for students, they are like a double-edged sword. It means that, it has both advantages and disadvantages. Some people believe that it will be great i students use these advises during their studying, while others, including me, think otherwise. In fact, we believe that its disadvantages for students outweigh its benefits.
Supports for this idea are maifold, however, two of which are stated in details hereunder.
To begin with, students as members of a society should be healthy, whether their spirits or their physical abilities. Consider students who use technological advises as "fixed children." Inasmuch as they are a school student, they should spend most of their time studying. Now, let's add the time which technological advises needed to the time they study. How disaster it can be! In fact, because they do not move from their posision, they tend to face a great number of physical problems like backache as well as neckache. Besides, they tend to become single-sighted, for they do not speak with others. Therefore, they are more prone to become depressed, fattigued people as they get older. If they do not use their phones, they have more free time meaning that they can excersice making them to live a healthy life. In adddition, inasmuch as they have the time to speak with others, not-fixed children are more likely to have a better spirit.
Last but, of course, not least, the foci of the fixed-children will dramatically decrease as their use of technological advises increase. This is because studying, most of them do not just use these advises for study issues. Rather, they tend to chat with their friends as well as check some applications like Facebook. According to the psychologists, when they spend even a little time on doing different works, it takes them sometime to back to their lessons. meaning that they lose both concentration and time. If they do not use these advises, on the other hand, their foci will significantly enhance. I have had this experience when I wanted to take an exam for my master. During that time, I had put my phone as well as my laptop aside and the result was satisfying. Because for sometimes, I have got bad scores which I knew that I did not deserve them, however, when I put these advises aside, I cope my exams.
To sum up, with all taken into account, I do believe that using these advises even by considering their benefits, have some bad effects on students as far as having bad impact on their healthiness and wasting their time and reducing their concentration is concerned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 955, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re more likely to have a better spirit. Last but, of course, not least, the foci...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 463, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meaning
...them sometime to back to their lessons. meaning that they lose both concentration and t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 758, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... well as my laptop aside and the result was satisfying. Because for sometimes, I have got bad ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, of course, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90928725702 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77941147851 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507559395248 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5764013303 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7083333333 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2916666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271684140538 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859837795911 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657384434812 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155471757344 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915438816904 0.0645574589148 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.