Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the course?
1. Some professors who are voted to be the most popular
2. some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research
Some students determine various types of professors for their courses. While some students select the professors who are esteemed as the most popular, some who are famous as salient researchers. It is so controvertible for them to decide on a specific conclusion. In my view, students should choose the most popular teachers. They can focus on classes, interest in talking provided by the teachers, and not complex lecture’s contents by respect from other students.
To begin with, students are capable of concentrating on the study as electing the classes by famous professors. The attitudes produced by each student are different from how teachers establish the lectures more intriguing. For instance, plenty of students sleep in the class because the professor does not yield impressive attention through a teaching style. Moreover, they sometimes ignore a lecture and communicate with their classmates. On the other hand, once the professor talks about the topic including considerate interests, students can more devote to their class. As a result, they should take a course educated by acclaimed professors.
Secondly, choosing some teachers recognized as popular produces an opportunity for students to interest in the lecture. After students notice that professors are the most attractive, their major or future jobs are often related to these particular courses. Take myself as an example, I took an English class in high school by the most popular teacher in my high school. I could gain profits in his lecture compared with past professors because he operated so intriguing talking skills. Therefore, I selected my major as English in my university affected by him. Consequently, young people should pick up the professors who are most popular in school.
Finally, the teachers who are respected by some students comfort concerns by students. When people select a course by a just syllabus, they are not able to evaluate each professor. They sometimes regret accepting the course where the teacher does not match with the study style of students. However, they fill in the gaps between the syllabus and real course to inquire into past students who took this particular class. Hence, they do not mistake selecting each course.
To sum up, students should participate in lectures by famous professors. I surely believe that they devote to each course, acquire an interest in the lectures, and ease their anxieties to select affordable classes.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32820512821 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79644274833 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515384615385 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6656626324 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29166666667 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263255244932 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825275416992 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098280714594 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15714850451 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101721593546 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32820512821 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79644274833 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515384615385 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6656626324 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29166666667 5.45110844103 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263255244932 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825275416992 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098280714594 0.0737576698707 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15714850451 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101721593546 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.