work three days a week for long time, or five days a weeks for short time?
Working has a tremendous and an influential impact on our daily lives. It enhances our success in immesearable ways because, it encompasses our core. Although, some people hold the view point to work five days a weeks for short time. Others, may hold different view point and prefer three days a week for long time. My personal experience and actual observation of life have led me to agree with the idea that, working three days with long time would be great for better personal and professional outcomes. In the following paragraph I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first most important reason is that, three days working would provide enough time for employees to engage in different activities and devote their time to do their hobbies and satisfy their family need. For instance, an extra two days off, would be enough to enrolled into certain physical activities a lone or with others. Furthermore, employees could use this time to accomplish certain tasks that accompany our contemporary lives. For instance, people could go for shopping, doing house chores and other stuff which require more time than the weekend could afford.
Another reason which desire some words, working for three hours and have extra free time would definitely enhance the workers abilities to perform their work more efficiently. Moreover, the employees would get an extra time to get relaxed and be away from stress. Thus, will give them more power to start working early and perform their duties with less mistakes. For instance, working for many days may show negative impact on workers and exposed them to an ample of pressure. Consequently, it will affect their concentration in work, and they might perform less efficiently.
In a nut shell, judging all what i have mentioned above, taking all factors into considerations, I would reinforce my idea that working for three days will be better for both personal and professional achievements. Thus, employees would have time to perform their duties and private stuff, and could focus more while working to accomplish better results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Working has a tremendous and an influent...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a week' or simply 'weeks'?
Suggestion: a week; weeks
...e hold the view point to work five days a weeks for short time. Others, may hold differ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lve into the most outstanding reasons. The first most important reason is that,...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re time than the weekend could afford. Another reason which desire some words, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing early and perform their duties with less mistakes. For instance, working for man...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d they might perform less efficiently. In a nut shell, judging all what i have ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11695906433 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59476524479 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0763620729 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.941176471 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462952111625 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156136432434 0.076458572812 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146947225505 0.0737576698707 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297341515264 0.150856017488 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111018235678 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.