Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Knowledge have an influential and tremendous impact on our daily lives. In fact, it is utterly important to be well informed in order to broaden our horizon and not to be a narrow minded. Although, some people hold the viewpoint that getting information from many sources is a good idea. However, others may hold a completely opposite viewpoint, by saying that it is more confusing to try many sources at a time. My personal experience and actual observation of life have led me to agree with the idea that many sources are not good. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
First and foremost, getting exposed to different sources at one time may confused us. Moreover, each source has its own information and a unique way to express the ideas, which may be different from other resources. For example; I remember when I was in a college, and I have to do a seminar about TMJ disorders. I tried google, library, and my professor's book. At the end, I ended up with dizziness and headache because, each source express the information in a heterogenous way. Thus, give me a clue to focus on one source for the next time, to avoid misleading.
Furthermore, trying many sources may sometimes be a time consuming. For instance; in high school, our teacher create a group for physics project, she asked us to prepare notes from a variety of resources and then collect all of them in one report. It took many hours from us to search different sources to get our required information. So, it was better to select one source like; google and type what ever is beneficial. This experience had taught me that looking in many resources to get notions is a wasting of time.
In a nutshell, judging all what I have mentioned above, taking all factors into considerations, I reinforce my idea that many sources are not effective in getting information, because it is going to confuse us and waste our precious time. Instead, focus on one good source is the best to be well informed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
Knowledge have an influential and tremendous impact on...
^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... horizon and not to be a narrow minded. Although, some people hold the viewpoint that ge...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 459, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a heterogenous way" with adverb for "heterogenous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...se, each source express the information in a heterogenous way. Thus, give me a clue to focus on one s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69318181818 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76442351744 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551136363636 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7022156846 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9473684211 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5263157895 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179207968951 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060429015064 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498848247277 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115022715494 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354090724832 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.