Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working importance is undeniable. People usually have to work throughout most of their lives, and they approximately work at least 40 hours a week once they get employed as a full time employee. Thus the need to increase the working efficiency is prominent and should be considered by every employer in order to improve their business. One way to increase efficiency of workers is to give them different tasks, since various kinds of tasks make them less bored, and also helps workers to flourish their creativity.
First and foremost, doing different kinds of tasks, solving various problems and dealing with combined problems makes workers to engage more in their job and thereby, makes them less bored. It goes without saying that, when people have to do different duties each day, instead of one repetitive one, they feel more useful and motivated, rather getting bored and feel stuck in a work loop, which diminishes the gain of everyone in a factory for example. According to the latest researches, conducted by Isfahan university, dealing with different problems each day makes one's brain more active which results in direct increase in performance of worker in working ambient. Thus different tasks every day, makes workers to engage more in their job and increases their performance, unconsciously.
Second of all, it is only by performing different kinds of tasks that an individual finds its talent and germinates in working circumstances. In fact, different tasks make workers engage in different fields and thus, gives them the chance to find out their true talent. In addition, when workers overcome different tasks, they may come up with novel ideas and suggestions for their employers, which may induce a huge benefit not only in time but also in money. Therefore, giving employees different tasks will let them flourish their talents and they may come up with good ideas.
All in all, according to aforementioned reasons above, giving workers different tasks will let them be more efficient and will help them to find out their talents. In both of these cases it will lead to a better working ambient
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...ours a week once they get employed as a full time employee. Thus the need to increase the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y get employed as a full time employee. Thus the need to increase the working effici...
^^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rformance of worker in working ambient. Thus different tasks every day, makes worker...
^^^^
Line 13, column 128, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...ill let them be more efficient and will help them to find out their talents. In both of these cas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12034383954 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62658678452 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518624641834 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6360111157 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.642857143 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228024277778 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849092576764 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500066643045 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145466511789 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405082839936 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.