Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
There is no doubt that nowadays, tasks in the jobs play a crucial role in daily people's lives. No one can deny the effects of various and kind of tasks on workers who work for factories or governments. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is what kind of tasks in jobs are more interested in a worker. Some people may hold this viewpoint that it is better to have similar and consistent tasks in all of the day. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that when workers have many different and various types of tasks in during workday are more interested. I firmly subscribe to the idea, the reasons I think so are manifold, which will be discussed widely hereunder.
First and foremost, in today's with an improving technology and using them in the ordinary life, people like to doing anything, which causes they are enjoying and satisfying. By doing so, workers do not like the same tasks in during a day, but rather enjoy varied tasks. The reason from a psychology standpoint, the people are doing the same works, they had exhausted and tedious after this work, in near futures workers will become anxious and worried, which cause from dissatisfying about how their tasks are defined.
Secondly, income and yield is an essential part of every job, if factories define various tasks for their workers in during a day, they will be more effective and do their duty with a high effort and endeavor. Therefore, their works as paving the way for people to reach the zenith a high prosperous. On the other hand, an empirical study in the Asia shows that most factories define the same tasks for their workers have less effective and yield, also the companies not only become more stagnation and recession in their budget, but being in predicament of business programming.
The last but not the least reason is that in every works for flourishing need a context due to convincing workers to utilize their intelligence in their tasks because they find suitable path even solve hiding difficulties in a simple way. By so doing, when employee confronts with a lot of tasks, causing some ideas and an innovative approach is evoked in their mind. In order to, the companies will deal with drawbacks and weakness in the excellent ways. On the contrary, another side in this approach can prevent and hinder the genius of workers in during tasks and even suppress their novelty ways which help to improve and solve difficulties.
To wrap it up, it is my profound belief that defines the many different tasks in during day worker can be enjoyed, more efficient, and innovative in their works to get the best result in every job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...to have similar and consistent tasks in all of the day. However, some others may take an o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 531, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...oint and believe that when workers have many different and various types of tasks in during wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ble path even solve hiding difficulties in a simple way. By so doing, when employee confronts w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... is my profound belief that defines the many different tasks in during day worker can be enjoy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, even so, i think, kind of, no doubt, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77969762419 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51599939885 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51403887689 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9482475769 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.176470588 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2352941176 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347090368317 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114271614011 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897943660031 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193747043796 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595407941715 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.