Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Works have an influential and tremendous impact on our lives. In fact, it is utterly important to be highly educated and have a wide range of experience because this will give the workers vast opportunities of a job because most of the companies or organizations ask for a person with a high knowledge. So, this will provide them with a reputation and respected tasks in the upcoming future. Therefore, I believe that performing more than one tasks or do distinct works is essential due to its benefits in both of improving the experience and enhance the communication skills.
To begin with, it is critical to instill the solid foundation of the learning because it is the way that will guide our nation to progress. Indeed, when the workers deal with different tasks a day, that is mean they will contact with different supervisors and people which will, in turn, help them to improve their information and broaden their horizon. For instance, at the workplace, the managers are deemed as a role model for almost all the labors, they guide them and provide them with the best word of advice because they are experts who are trained for such a skill. Moreover, they endow their coworkers with the beneficial information that will reflect positively on their future experience. Thus, when the people will seek for many tasks to do daily, this will help them to refine their knowledge and help them to thrive easily in the community. In contrast, those who use to do only one task a day, they will have limited information because they will be less contributed to their job because of the monotonous work, same friends and same issues. Consequently, people should be surged to look for different jobs because this will aid them to sharpen their working ability.
Second, it is vital to establish a strong bond for our large social network because this will create a solid foundation of the communication skills. Indeed, being involved with many tasks will give them the chances to meet different people from diverse spheres which will, in turn, reflect positively on their personalities and the acquiring attributes. For example, before three years, I worked at two different companies with two different managers, each one of them creates a friendlier atmosphere at the workplace, that helped me with my peers to deal effectively with each other. Furthermore, that environment helps us to learn how to cooperate efficiently and collaborate effectively. Thus, such a collaborative environment enhanced our social skills immensely. So, these two places improve my interpersonal relationships. On the same hand, those who used to work at the same place, they will be somewhat isolated because they will have limited peers and this will, in turn, reflect negatively on their future work outcome and productivity. In conclusion, working with many people have a great impact on our future social skills.
To sum up, it is essential to work many tasks in order to carve out and harvest a vast array of information and refine the communication skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'high knowledge'.
Suggestion: high knowledge
... or organizations ask for a person with a high knowledge. So, this will provide them with a repu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 879, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...n the community. In contrast, those who use to do only one task a day, they will ha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2545.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00984251969 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80357741914 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456692913386 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8821863789 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1669669396 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568222463526 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505537971851 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107271698945 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414117654012 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.