Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Playing an indispensable role in both individual and professional lives of all people, working has been of the first-rate importance for all individuals. However, there are many ways that you can work during work time. A question that might arise, with respect to this fact, is whether or not playing on different types of tasks is efficient or not. Personally, I am of the conviction that doing similar tasks during the workday is more efficient than concentrating on one. Not only can the employees learn to handle their time, but also doing multiple tasks is more interesting for them.
To commence with, if you have different tasks to do, you will be forced to learn how to manage your time in order to not forgetting any tasks. This will help you improve other skills rather than the pieces of knowledge that you gain when you are doing your tasks. To elucidate, there is two side of learning when you are working. In one side, you learn the hard skills that you should know in order to do your task accurately. The other side, you have to improve your soft skills. It means you have to improve some skills not to lose your concentration and increase your efficiency. Take my experience as an example, last year our company went through a rough time and it that way we had to do a lot of tasks in our workday. Some of my employees found themselves not efficient enough and they couldn't handle their tasks and in the end, our company had no chance but to let them go.
Another justification lending credence to the argument is that working on a single task in the workday is boring that if you can not find any solution to the running task you will feel so hopelessly unable to solve them. Broadly speaking, in many cases concentrating on one task is not that much efficient as you think. I can recall my experience when I worked in a company that each day I had to do one task. Over the course of time, when I faced new problems in doing my task I couldn't overcome my problems and concentrate on that single task all day long had made me so exhausted. In that way, I felt not efficient at all and that decrease my confidence and capabilities to work properly.
Drawing upon the reasons, I am convinced that doing multiple tasks during the workday is a better choice rather than doing a single task. Adopting this policy would have a number of benefits that flourished workplaces is one of them. For this reason, I strongly recommend workers to not concentrate and force themselves to just do a single task per day. In this way, individuals would flourish.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ht arise, with respect to this fact, is whether or not playing on different types of tasks is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...hemselves not efficient enough and they couldnt handle their tasks and in the end, our ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...I faced new problems in doing my task I couldnt overcome my problems and concentrate on...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, broadly speaking, in many cases, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 43.0788530466 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55844155844 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58654295469 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463203463203 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.613680877 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7272727273 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77272727273 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347257982801 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107698115511 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699100964683 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218869939687 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116862088901 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.