Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Playing an indispensable role in both individual and professional lives of all people, learning has been of the first-rate importance for all people. However, there are a different kind of ways that we can learn and expand our knowledge. A question that might arise, with respect to this fact, is whether or not teachers who are responsible for teaching us knowledge are less appreciated nowadays. Personally, I am of the conviction that Teachers are less appreciated by society. Not only, are not the role they play to expand our knowledge that much bold, but also, there are more jobs than before.
To commence with, teachers in the past, played an important role and children had to go to school to learn what they really needed to their lives. Strictly speaking, the teachers were one way and also the only way you could expand your knowledge. But nowadays, with the advent of technology, people are less interested in going to school. To delineate, there is also a tendency among people to learn through experiencing and academic stuff that our teachers teach to us are less important to us, too. To illustrate, research done by German researchers reveals that people in the future will not attend any classes. That being so, the role of teachers that they had in our lives are going to be less important to us and the result of that is we will not value their works.
Another justification lending credence to the argument is the variety of jobs that nowadays exist. Broadly speaking, the individuals who were teachers had high social status among people because there were not many jobs. To elucidate, people who were highly educated find teaching more important that they chose to be a teacher to pass through their knowledge to other people. Making money was less important to them that it is nowadays. That being so, people really appreciated their vocation. Over the course of time, the importance of the teacher's calling decreased among people and after several years, being teacher was not the sign of high education anymore. As I recall, my mother was so proud that she once was a teacher and all my family member respect her so much. But my teachers in a school are not being valued anymore among us.
Drawing upon the reasons, I am convinced that nowadays teachers are less valued by society than they were in the past. However, the teachers still play an important role in expanding our knowledge and teach us the fundamental basics of life. For that fact, I strongly recommend that people should value their teachers as they did in the past. In this way, our children would flourish.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
... people. However, there are a different kind of ways that we can learn and expand ou...
^^^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ht arise, with respect to this fact, is whether or not teachers who are responsible for teachi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, so, still, broadly speaking, kind of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 15.1003584229 212% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2161.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82366071429 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54570681861 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457589285714 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 657.9 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1025110532 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9565217391 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4782608696 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204819783765 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675688819831 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620438958937 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143396161099 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354098573318 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.