birds injures from glasses
The reading and lecturer both are about birds. They cannot distinguish between glass and air, so they often injured by glass on buildings. The author suggests the three possible solutions to prevent the injuries. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in lecture. He says that none of the solution prevent the birds from harmed.
First of all, the author claims that replace the regular clear glass with one way glass. Person from inside can see outside, but birds cannot see through window. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He thinks that birds can see reflecting light from the glass. Furthermore, he points out that if bids see reflection of sky or tree, then they understand that it is sky or tree. Birds are try to go toward those glasses, and eventually they harmed.
Secondly, the author states that colorful strips on the glass prevent the birds too see through glass, because they would see the lines and try to avoid them. The lecturer rebuts this point by asserting that through the opening in design people could see the outside, but birds understand it as a hole , and they try to fly into that. He elaborates on this by mentioning that if glass are painted by too much colorful paintings or lines, then rooms become too dark. Thus, this is not a appropriate solution.
Thirdly, the author mentions that a building in a bird flight path can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building. The lecture on the other hand, states that this is useful for the those who travel long distance not for those who travel short distance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to see'?
Suggestion: to see
...l strips on the glass prevent the birds too see through glass, because they would see t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tside, but birds understand it as a hole , and they try to fly into that. He elabo...
^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ooms become too dark. Thus, this is not a appropriate solution. Thirdly, the au...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77385159011 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36771361116 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537102473498 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8172475833 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.4705882353 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350082300607 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101392541287 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106271390591 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204835166677 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06507303105 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.