space tourism
The article states that the privatization of spaceflights will bring advantages for both government and public. However, the speaker thinks otherwise and refutes each of the reasons used in the article.
To begin with, the passage insists that the privatization of the space industry will decrease the cost of space flights since competition among private companies. As a result tourists and scholars will benefit from reducing prices. Nonetheless, the lecturer contends this point by explaining that any spaceship requires expensive systems, for preventing from collisions. Besides that spacecrafts call for very high-cost testing that will not allow prices to go down.
What is more, the reading reports that private aerospace companies will sponsor scientific researches, that lead to an increase in some crucial discoveries. Still, the listening asserts that private companies can preclude from developing of researchers. According to the speaker, specialists can move from government occupations to private occupations and start to work on commercial stuff instead of fundamental issues.
In addition, the article claims that costs and taxes of space exploration will lie on customers of the industry that allow carrying the burden easier. Nevertheless, the lecture opposes this point by explaining that cost so huge that a few tourists will able to pay for it. As a result, private investments cannot provide enough money to the space projects. Taxes are an essential part of space exploration that will not go even if private companies come to this area.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, in addition, as a result, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51867219917 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90800625938 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3060857649 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.307692308 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107126429822 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423930772917 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066065030746 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617641665617 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638265005898 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.