Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they address the specific ideas about solar energy described in the reading passage.
Solar energy is a very promising, clean and lucrative source of energy, as compared to non-renewable fossil fuel energy. The passage aims to summarize the merits of solar energy, mainly on three basis: eliminate reliance on fossil fuel, non-pollutant nature and low maintenance cost. Although, the professor provides some undermining views on the non-pollutant nature of the solar energy, he still states that the beneficial factors out-weights all the negative ones. He talks about solar energy mainly focusing on: offset production, multi-faceted uses and financial benefits.
First of all, the passage merits use of solar energy for its ability to reduce the reliance on fossil fuels which are being consumed at a much higher rate and are not provident in the future. It states that solar energy can become a new force with no fear of over-production or exhaustion. The professor does not further illustrate on this topic .
Secondly, the lecture talks about clean, environment friendly effects of solar energy, as compared to foul smell emitting fossil fuel. The professor holds the same view, however, initially he has some consternation regarding the need of using pollutant fossil fuel for the production of solar energy. But he later on, undermines this by stating that offset production of solar energy after 5 years, can easily overcome all such need. So, it is a non-pollutant energy source.
Thirdly, the passage talks about the low cost of solar energy. The professor further illustrates on this topic by not only explaining the financial benefits of production but also focusing on advantages for sale of solar energy. In doing so, he talks about, the tax incentives that helps to easily offset the cost of installation and provides better environment for sales. He adds that, we only need to pay for the initial panels and let the savings flow in. Additionally, the professor puts some light in multi-faceted use of solar energy, where he focuses on health benefits of the solar energy, in comparison to non-renewable fuels.
So, to sum up, solar energy has a lot of merits as compared to fossil fuels. It is environment friendly, requires low money input, has health benefits and can easily outrun the initial cost of production. Both the lecture and the passage agree on this view. However, still people are not exploiting this benefits in an expected way, which has made the professor confounded.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...oes not further illustrate on this topic . Secondly, the lecture talks about ...
^^
Line 17, column 314, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an expected way" with adverb for "expected"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...people are not exploiting this benefits in an expected way, which has made the professor confounde...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 30.3222958057 188% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1373.03311258 149% => OK
No of words: 394.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17766497462 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81710161844 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482233502538 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 651.6 419.366225166 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3138775653 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 4.33554083885 346% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126913723525 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476691309908 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335717719249 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827690748305 0.162205337803 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238051564632 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.