Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
Based on the seemingly reasonable evidence, the reading insists that there might be three reasons that humans are impossible to maintain a presence on Venus. However, the professor strongly disapproves of the above and then presents several pieces of evidence to support his statement.
First, the reading contends that it is the extremely high pressure at Venus' surface that humans cannot survive. Yet, the professor refutes this conclusion, demonstrating that if we build a station floating in the atmosphere, where the pressure there is equal to that on Earth.
Moreover, the reading attempts to inform that water is absent from Venus, so there is no chance for humans to establish a station there. The professor, however, suggests that it is possible to produce water through some chemical process by using the composition in the atmosphere.
At last, the reading assumes that very little sunlight can pass through the thick clouds and gases on Venus. But the professor points out that, if humans can set up a station at the height of fifty kilometers, it is probable that some light passing through thin clouds and the reflected light is sufficient for the solar power cells to generate electricity.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the possibility of step on Venus, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16228070175 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70239155736 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570175438596 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9661106553 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.777777778 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10676090364 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445422595224 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674061206107 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689873181351 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799256292599 0.0443174109184 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.