Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about endotherms, which are animals who can maintain a constant body temperature. The author of the reading believes that dinosaurs were endotherms and he provides some theories. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in the article. She states that all those theories are able to be disproved.
First of all, the author points out that during the excavation, scientists found some fossils of dinosaurs in Polar regions. It states that only endotherms are able to survive at those weather conditions, because of their ability to retain temperature at the constant rate. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says that weather conditions were less harsh in the past than it is now. So, it was possible to non-endotherms to survive there.
Secondly, the author contends that dinosaurs, in contrast with modern reptiles, had an underneath legs position, which is one of the features of endotherms. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that this legs position is not a trait of endotherms. Moreover, dinosaurs had a great weight, so it is a one explanation of this body structure.
Finally, the author states that dinosaur`s fossils contained Haversian canals, which provide a rapid growth. Furthermore, this pattern of growth inherits to endotherms. The lecturer on the other hand posits that also in those fossils were found growth rings, which can give us an information about dinosaur`s growth. So, scientist noticed that during the cool period the dinosaur`s growth stopped and when the temperature increased the animal started to grow again. In addition, this is one of the characteristic on non-endotherms.
In conclusion, I would like to say that there are a lot of theories, which support the information that dinosaurs were endotherms, but no one of them unproved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...dotherms and he provides some theories. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made ...
^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndotherms, but no one of them unproved.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23569023569 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03508040923 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538720538721 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.783242277 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8421052632 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6315789474 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.062368553211 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263658457304 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527710033944 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0366342626036 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453939832928 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.