TPO-05 - Integrated Writing Task
The passage proposes three theories concerning the application of great houses in Chaco Canyon. On the other hand, the professor believes that these theories are not convincing. In the following, I will explicate what the relationship between the content of the passage and professor's opinion.
First of all, the passage hypothesizes that the mentioned houses had a residential application due to its analogy to the new apartments at Taos. On the contrary side, the professor states that in spite of their apparent similarity, their interior was not analogous to those of the modern apartments. Investigations prove that there were a few fireplaces in this houses that suggest that it has a residential application.
Second, the passage contends that these apartments might be used as a warehouse to store food supplies. On the other hand, the professor counters that the results of investigations point to the conclusion that there is not a trace of maize remnants available in these houses. This proves that these places were not used for storing purposes.
Third, the passage states that these houses may be used for ceremonial purposes because of the mounds of enormous deposits containing a lot of broken pots that were found during excavation. The professor is of the opinion that this debris of pots belonged to the construction workers and they may throw it away after using. Also, there is a lot of remnants that were related to the construction process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ove that there were a few fireplaces in this houses that suggest that it has a resid...
^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...n. The professor is of the opinion that this debris of pots belonged to the construc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, may, second, so, third, first of all, in spite of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17154811715 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89708394062 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52719665272 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9935242081 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229792904218 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860659513002 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689408798268 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132445143191 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136121592847 0.0443174109184 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.