TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.
In the set of material, both the Reading passage and lecture have opositive reasons to support there opinions about literature, in general. There are three reasons with opositive point both author and lecturer.
First of all, the Reading passage affirms that Young people are Reading far less literature, novels, plays, and poems, than they used to. This is troubling in us opinion because the trend has unfortunate effects for the Reading public, for culture in general. Even though, the lecture pourpose that the literature nowdays has much quality and creative, as well as the literature is estimulate the imagination of young people. Besides, the lecturer says that intelectual literature is much present nowdays, like science’s books, history’s books, another things.
In the second place, the author claims that consider the prevalence of self-help books on list os best sellers. These are usually superficial poorly written, and intelectually undemanding. However, the lecturer refutes this point saying that the counts of books change. They are much avaible and cultural, with intelectual historys.
Thrid and last, the Reading passage pourpose that the trend of Reading less literature is all the more regrettable because it is taking place during a period when good literature is beging written. There are many talented writers today, but theylack na audience. The lecturer explain this point saying that standards have dificulte on understand the “good literature”, so they have less audience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'os the best'.
Suggestion: os the best
...e prevalence of self-help books on list os best sellers. These are usually superficial ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...any talented writers today, but theylack na audience. The lecturer explain this p...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
...but theylack na audience. The lecturer explain this point saying that standards have d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, another thing, in general, as well as, first of all, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59227467811 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81626833096 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583690987124 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1598126516 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.230769231 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459579590402 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144427243247 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122655574285 0.0662205650399 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249265342196 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14601271525 0.0443174109184 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.