TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task
I desagree with the statement that It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. There are three reasons to support my opinion.
First of all, I am inclined to believe that all people have an inclination to specific area or subject, as science, math, physical, sicology, pshycology, another. People never could have a broad knowledge about all subjects, excepet a genious. Even though, incluid genious are specifics in a subject. For example, Galileu Galilei was dedicade to learn about physical, It was the subject that he had much afinity.
In the second place, in my opinion, people have had focous in a specific subject. Through search that citizens development the World and learn about diverses things . Like research, It is better to have knowledge in a subject and can study about us, apprimoraty and broad your knowledge to other people, maybe, this be a form of contribute with the society.
Thrdly, In my point of view, teenager in a middium school would alredy themself specific in a determined area of knowledge, conform required. For example, In my country, differently of advangade countrys, young people have see all subjects in a curriculum grade. Only one person are obrigated to learn about science, physical, language, phsycology, sicology and many other, suming, It is 12 subjects. Whereas country like United States, teenager seen subject that think better and fell much afinity. I agree that whereas children, people have see all subjects to discovered what they think better. Some people could desagree with me, but I believe that a student only need learn about basics subjects, like math and languages, and run to way that fell better.
In conclusion, there are my reasons to support my opinion about desagree with the statement "It is better to havebroad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I desagree with the statement that It is...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e subject that he had much afinity. In the second place, in my opinion, peop...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...a specific subject. Through search that citizens development the World and learn about d...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he World and learn about diverses things . Like research, It is better to have kn...
^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a form of contribute with the society. Thrdly, In my point of view, teenager in...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'seen'.
Suggestion: seen
...f advangade countrys, young people have see all subjects in a curriculum grade. Onl...
^^^
Line 9, column 544, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'seen'.
Suggestion: seen
...gree that whereas children, people have see all subjects to discovered what they th...
^^^
Line 9, column 761, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uages, and run to way that fell better. In conclusion, there are my reasons to s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1873015873 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70977004732 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0816966739 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00881143916884 0.236089414692 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0037851162637 0.076458572812 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0146596922528 0.0737576698707 20% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00406744134497 0.150856017488 3% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00813488268994 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.