TPO 28
The reading and listening passages both deal with the same thing that Peary did reach the North Pole or not. The reading passage believes the Peary's claim, and gives three reasons. However, the professor disagrees with that, and challenges the reasons mentioned in the reading passage.
First, although the author says that the conclusion of the investigation from a committee proves the Peary's claim, the professor does not think it is trustworthy. This is mainly because the leader in National Geographic Society is the close friend of Peary, and the group donated money to Peary's exploration. In other words, the investigation of that committee is not completely objective. Moreover, the investigation took only 2 days, it is impossible to investigate carefully. Thus, the conclusion of the investigation cannot be consider as the solid evidence.
Second, the author states it is possible to do it, according to a recent expedition less than 37 days. Nonetheless, the professor claims that the weather condition in the recent exploration was good, which was beneficial to the expedition. Besides, Avery's food was transported by airplane, which is also different from Peary's condition. Therefore, Avery's expedition cannot prove the possibility of Peary's expedition. Third, even though the author thinks the photographs can give a support, the professor disagrees with is. This is because, the condition of the photo is not good, which have already fade and blurred, so it is impossible to calculate the sun's position precisely. Consequently, this photo cannot prove Peary's claim.
In conclusion, the professor casts doubt on the point and reasons in the reading passage,and expresses doubts that Peary reached the North Pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 600, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'faded'.
Suggestion: faded
...e photo is not good, which have already fade and blurred, so it is impossible to cal...
^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...point and reasons in the reading passage,and expresses doubts that Peary reached the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40959409594 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93272284371 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557195571956 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6469168127 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360178855288 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107731483342 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740667267027 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207568076691 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362977371058 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.