Tpo 28
The article discusses a fascinating topic about the peary journey to reach the north pole and provides three reasons of support. However, professor explains that in the lecture that the evidence are not solid and contradict each of the authors reason.
First, the reading passage discusses that the National geographical team investigated and found that his claims are consistent and persuassive. In contract the professor provides the information that it is true that National Geographics team confirmed that and did not object about anything. But, She states that as the team is composed of his closed friends who sponsored his trip. Moreover, they only took 2 days to investigate it so this is quite biased results. Peary also claimed that records are not investigated thoroughly and carefully. Clearly a discreapency exist between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor.
Secondly, the article pushes forth the idea about the british explorer who reached there in less than 37 days , so this confirms that the peary also reached there in 37 days. Professor contradicts this statement by saying that British explorer, journey was different from the peary because Envey, took less food with him as the airplane drop food for him. Moreover, when he traveled, weather conditions were quite favourable that's why he reached there speadily. However, things were different when Peary traveled.
Thirdly, the author posits that the photograph which he took on the pole measure the shadow position in the sun. Professor cast doubt about it by saying that this picture was taken 100's of years ago when the techniques were not that advanced and this picture is quite fuzzy and unfocued. Also , as 100 of years passed so that's why now it is faded, worn over and shadows are so blurred that it cannot be used to position the sun.
So, the reading passage and the lectures discussed intresting information about the pears journey towards the north pole. As significant amount of evidence in the lectures supports that while the reading passage fails to justify the claims towards it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r who reached there in less than 37 days , so this confirms that the peary also re...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atement by saying that British explorer, journey was different from the peary bec...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... different from the peary because Envey, took less food with him as the airplane ...
^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood for him. Moreover, when he traveled, weather conditions were quite favourable...
^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...eather conditions were quite favourable thats why he reached there speadily. However,...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cture is quite fuzzy and unfocued. Also , as 100 of years passed so thats why now...
^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...cued. Also , as 100 of years passed so thats why now it is faded, worn over and shad...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e pears journey towards the north pole. As significant amount of evidence in the l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12280701754 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58494805808 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517543859649 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3817539434 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.058823529 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317895030864 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982182358474 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799658564897 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162998339529 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646760397491 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.