TPO 29
The reading and the listening passages have a debate on migration hypothesis of dinosaures. The writer puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which refuted by the following speaker.
First, The writer suggests that the edmontosaurs needed to migration for finding foods, because in the winter, there were not plants at North Slope, While the speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to her, the weather condition at 100 million years ago was warmer and 24 hour a day of sunshine caused that plant growth properly, As a result, with being available food sources in winter, there was not no need to migration.
The second preposition offered by writer was that the Edmontosaurus should live in herds for becoming able to immigrate and there are some evidences for supporting this point. However, the speaker casts doubt on this assumption by saying that living in the herd is not related to migration. It may be because of other benefits such as surviving from predators. In addition some elk that live in the herd do not migrate.
Lastly, the writer proposes that edmonosaurs had enough physically power for migrating through harsh situations. On the other hand, the speaker holds an opposite view. She explains that if they were powerful, they could resist in cold North conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...100 million years ago was warmer and 24 hour a day of sunshine caused that plant gro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ts such as surviving from predators. In addition some elk that live in the herd do not m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, while, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08878504673 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63404297118 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64953271028 0.540411800872 120% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7185470579 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287237497819 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892276944971 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646409950504 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147087075898 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528611377435 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.