TPO 37 Integrated essay
The reading and the lecture are both discuss about the invention called turtle excluder device that is used in order to decline turtle death in nets. The reading states three disadvantages of using the TED; nevertheless, the lecture doubts about what the reading said.
Firstly, the reading mentioned that the shrimper’s argument that the turtles are rarely get trapped, therefore if the their shrimp boat all equipped with the TED, it might be another heavy cost for them, what’s more the lecture says that if those boats indeed equipped with the TED, it might cause even more negative effects on turtle preservation also on shrimp industry.
Secondly, the reading claims that applying alternative methods of protecting sea turtles that may be more effective than using TEDs, that is to limit the time that shrimp boats keep their nets underwater. On the other hand, the lecture argues that applying alternative ideas is just a way that only appears in the theories, for instance it is impossible for governments to monitor all thousands of shrimp boats at the same time, and therefore it is much easier and convenient for governments to make sure that every boats use the TEDs before cruising than using alternative methods.
Lastly, the reading illustrates that TEDs are not effective for those larger species of endangered sea turtles, because there are some certain species can grow pretty large that TEDs can’t provide therefore unable to catch it. Nonetheless the lecture opposes that indeed the size of the TEDs is too small for some large species, on the flip side, in some areas there are still needed, and the producer can modify the TED without changing its function.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...es are rarely get trapped, therefore if the their shrimp boat all equipped with the TED, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nonetheless,
...t provide therefore unable to catch it. Nonetheless the lecture opposes that indeed the siz...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10752688172 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5363583451 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.4144557567 49.2860985944 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.571428571 110.228320801 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.8571428571 21.698381199 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 19.5714285714 7.06452816374 277% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.3589403974 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 53.8541721854 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.0289183223 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.