TPO 40
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
According to these materials, the reading passage is about difficulties for human exist on Venus, and the listening is a lecture by a professor that solves these problems.
First, the writer suggests that atmospheric pressure is so high in Venus surface which make it impossible for human to stand on it. The speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to him, the pressure amount at 50 Km above the Venus is equal to earth's one, so it is possible for human going to that position.
The second point offered by the writer is due to the shortage of water and temporary presence of mankind on Venus by providing it's sources from earth. However, the speaker casts doubt on this statement by saying that in spied of not existing water on Venus it is a solvable problem. Existing of chemical materials such as carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid demonstrates that acquiring oxygen and water is possible trough chemical reactions. As a result, mankind settlement on Venus is an anticipated event.
Lastly, the writer claims that huge amounts of clouds which reflect 60% of sunlight cause Venus's surface be very cool place both for living and producing power supply used in electrical devices. On contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. He explains that not only by regulating reflected sunlight but also with ones which can receive to surface, we can produce more electrical energy 100% of beams for using in our instruments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of beams for using in our instruments.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95473251029 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58742053835 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8896302513 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.454545455 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0909090909 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308458152853 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103620691494 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463134210148 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163831050257 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477331692735 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.