tpo 48

Essay topics:

tpo 48

The reading and the lecture both are discussing the methods which can be used to solve the problem of frogs declining. While the reading passage mentioned three possible solutions. However, the lecture refutes all of them giving three strong evidences.

First and foremost, the reading claims that frog declining was due to the use of pesticide chemicals by farmers. However, the lecture refutes this claim by saying that it is not fair to rely on it. Moreover, the professor said that it is very important for farmers to use these chemicals to treat certain diseases that affect their plants and prohibit the spread of these diseases to other plants. This will increase the opportunity to get more crops and be competitive with other farmers and yeild more crops as compared to them.

Second, the reading makes the argument that frogs are declining due to fungus that spread every where with fatal effects, and states the use of antifungal drugs in treating the diseased frogs. Incontrast, the lecture counters this argument saying that it is more expensive and time consuming to use this method, because it requries to treat each individual frog, and it is hard to capture and reach all of them. Furthermore, the professor said this method will not prevent the transmission of disease to offsprings, so the process must be repeated again and again.

Third, the reading states that frogs declined because their natural habitats threatened like; human uses of water that damage the frog's eggs. The lecture refutes this claim by saying that it is not true that the uses of water causes the harm to the habitats. Additionally, the professor said that global warming is the main cause that contributed to many habitats cause the extinction and it is not the human.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture both are dis...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o solve the problem of frogs declining. While the reading passage mentioned three pos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them giving three strong evidences. First and foremost, the reading claims t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se the opportunity to get more crops and be competitive with other farmers and ye...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eild more crops as compared to them. Second, the reading makes the argument t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...are declining due to fungus that spread every where with fatal effects, and states the use ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeated'.
Suggestion: repeated
...e to offsprings, so the process must be repeated again and again. Third, the reading s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss must be repeated again and again. Third, the reading states that frogs de...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Third, the reading states that frogs declined because their natural hab...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98310810811 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47966298975 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503378378378 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5330575375 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.461538462 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315739423139 0.272083759551 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117241439239 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112369161002 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202401726579 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892952616722 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.