TPO 48
The reading passage proposes some solutions for preventing the frug population to decline since they are a considarable part of ecosystem. The lecture, however, casts doubt on the proposed solutions and offers come claims to refute them all. It is also mentiond in the lecture that not of ideas are practical.
First, the reading argues that more strict regulations which prohibit the farmers in frugs’ habitats from using harmful pesticides, which damage nervous system and make breathing difficult, lower the decrease of frug population. On the contrary, the cecturer is of the idea that since this method would be very expensive for the farmers of sush areas and they also would hervast far fewer products due to loss fo crops by pests, it is not economical for them. In adittion, she mentions that it is not fair for they can not compete with other farmers.
Next, the passage brings up the idea that treatment cam be effective in order to cure the diseases caused by a kind of toxic fungus which thicken the skin, and accordingly, dehydrates frugs’ bodies. In contrast, the professor highlights the fact that these treatments have to be applied individualy; therefore, capturing and treating each frug is an infeasible method. Moreover, she states that since the treatments do not transfer to the offsprings and every generation needs its own treatment it would be very expensive and difficult to impleament.
Finally, the passage mentions that drying the wet environments where are frugs’ habitates is another reason of population declination; consequently, preserving these environments can save frugs. Conversly, the speakerdismisses the issue due to the fact that most of the desication is caused by global farming and human activities which are of a smaller scale can not compensate for warming effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in contrast, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27303754266 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91179690134 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8485518165 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.454545455 110.228320801 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 21.698381199 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161819888305 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561374464878 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384675657176 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915119679356 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352553225962 0.0443174109184 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.