TPO 49 Integerated writing

Essay topics:

TPO 49 Integerated writing

The reading passage explains three evidence to show humpback whales use stars to navigate. However, in the lecture, the professor states that these pieces of evidence are not convincing and provides three supports for his assert.

First of all, the author of passage claims that humpback whales' intelligence led to ability that enable them to orient by using stars. While the lecturer repudiates the connection between intelligence and their navigation ability by pointing that other animals like ducks which have a medium amount of intelligence, also have general cognitive ability. Therefore, it is instinct animal capability with which they born and do not show aforementioned connection.

Additionally, the reading passage mentions that because humpback migrate on a straight line so they must be guided by an external objects like other animals that move in one direction. On the other hand, the professor explains that the external guidance is not stars but it is earth magnetic field. In other word, animals like humpback whales have bio magnetite sensor in their brain which help them to navigate.

Finally, although the passage points out the idea of spy-hopping as an instrument humpback wales use to get navigation information by looking at stars, the professor suggest sharks that show this behavior to hunt rather than look at stars. So, it is not a scarce behavior between marine animals.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...hopping as an instrument humpback wales use to get navigation information by lookin...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, look, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30357142857 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70251205891 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59375 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7430360868 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378370614152 0.272083759551 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131986096679 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631769980189 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205485500452 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452374017636 0.0443174109184 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.