TPO 52
The reading discusses the probaility of colonizing astroids and argues that colonizing an astroid can e more beneficial than conolizing a planet or moon. However, the lecturer rebukes this notion and avers that colonizing astroids would be impractical and inefficient. In what follows the reasons each side provide to champion their idea are elaborated.
First of all, the reading states that because of lower gravity on astroids the landing and taking off of an astroids will be easier and also the spaceships what travel there can carry more cargo with themselves becasue of that. Conversely, the lecturer claims that while lower gravity might help landing and taking off processes, it can bring many plights to the travelers. He points out that in lower gravity people suffer from mucsle and bone density deterioration. Therefore, colonizers in low gravity environment can face serious health conditions.
Furthermore, the lecturer agress with the reading that some rare metals exist on the astroids and they can be mined. Yet, he asserts that these mining cannot be profitable. The expenses of establishing a colony on an astroid and then shipping the material back to erah might exceed the cargo value. In addition, there is possibility that an increase in the amount of these valuale metals o erath will lead to a decline in their worth.
Fially, the reading asserts that some astroids can get very close to earth while spinning their orbit and consequently more accessible than other plants. However, the lecturer argues that reaching these astroids might be easier but the orbits of them might be unusual and in their movement they go far beyond than a planet like mars. Hence, going back to earth will be major quandry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | AT2G38040 | 85 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | parsaramezan | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | lutzuming | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 81 | view |
- Some people like to spend their money as soon as they earn it while others think it is better to save their money for some time in the future Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 45
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview. "When the Grandview Symphony was established ten years ago, the city of Grandview agreed to provide the symphony with annual funding until the symphony became self-sust 66
- TPO 52 3
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an astroid' or simply 'astroids'?
Suggestion: an astroid; astroids
... astroids the landing and taking off of an astroids will be easier and also the spaceships ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to land' or 'land'.
Suggestion: to land; land
...ims that while lower gravity might help landing and taking off processes, it can bring ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10563380282 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59624307024 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552816901408 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7125381936 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.571428571 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.