TPO 8 - Integrated
memoir that was written by Chevalier de Seingalt
The main idea of both the reading and the talk is about whether memoir that was written by Chevalier de Seingalt is accurate historical resource or not. In the text, the author of the reading claims that there some doubts about the reliability of memoir. The lecturer challenges all the viable examples that mentioned in the reading. She is of the opinion that all of these critics is unfair.
Firstly, the author of the reading states that when Chevalier was living in Switzerland was not wealthy because he borrowed money from other people. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that he was very wealthy, and he invested a plethora of money on gambling and parties. Because his money was not in cash, he borrowed money from his friends to exchange his asset to cash.
In addition, the author believes that the conversation records between Chevalier and famous writer , namely Voltaire, are not accurate. The lecturer, on the other hand, asserts that there are plenty piece of paper that shown Chevalier took note every night before his meeting with famous writer. Thus, because he had numerous note about his meeting, his memoir is reliable. Thus, by using these notes, the memoir could be written accurately.
Eventually, the article notes that the story that was written about Chevalier escape from prison by using a piece of metal is not reliable. The lecturer, conversely, brings up the idea that there are many other powerful prisoner in the Venice prison, if they had chanced to bribed to jailers, they would have escaped from prison. Furthermore, she mentions that there is a fact that show the ceiling of prison repaired after Chevalier escaped from prison.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The main idea of both the reading and the talk is about whether memoir that wa...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that all of these critics is unfair. Firstly, the author of the reading state...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iends to exchange his asset to cash. In addition, the author believes that th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ords between Chevalier and famous writer , namely Voltaire, are not accurate. The ...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'pieces'?
Suggestion: pieces
...her hand, asserts that there are plenty piece of paper that shown Chevalier took note...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the memoir could be written accurately. Eventually, the article notes that ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'prisoners'?
Suggestion: prisoners
...idea that there are many other powerful prisoner in the Venice prison, if they had chanc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed after Chevalier escaped from prison.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, thus, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98576512456 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4243418133 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505338078292 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6539018766 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.071428571 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230545247185 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812443370479 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919681659853 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1369198637 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06233193182 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.