TPO_19
The reading and the lecture are both about “buzzing." The author of the reading believes many critics would like buzzing to be banned. the lecturer challenges the statements made by the author. He is of the opinion that dissenting from those critics argues for buzzing in three aspects.
First of all, the author suggests that the critics complain that consumers should know whether a person praising a product is being paid to praise the product or not. This argument is challenged by the lecture. He says although they are paid by companies, are actually previous users having enjoyed the product and willing to share their real thoughts with us.
Secondly, the writer contends that buzzers pretend they are just private individuals, consumers listen to their endorsements less critically than they should. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that they question about details such as price, service and the buzzer’s familiarity before drawing their final decision according to the responses.
Finally, it is stated in the article that the harmful effect that buzzing is likely to have on social relationships. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that he indicates that buzzers are only employed to promote worthy products they ever used to leave consumers a nice experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ritics would like buzzing to be banned. the lecturer challenges the statements made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 208.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33173076923 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80571172899 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629807692308 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4896896257 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436878004663 0.272083759551 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142425683876 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953450953949 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232757275299 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653252698303 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.