TPO41-Power Plant rules
The lecture and the passage discuss the suggestion of new rules for power plants to control their coal ash. Although the passage claims that these power companies have some strong theories which exhibit the unnecessarity of these rules, the speaker refutes these ideas through a number of reasons which will be described in this report.
First of all, the passage points out that the current regulations are efficient and addition regulations is not necessary. The speaker, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that current rules are not suffiecient. She also mentions that for instance the rule of using liner is for companies which will be established in future on new landfill. Therefore, the old landfills migh not consider by this special liner; thus, this coal ash might leak into drinking water which is deleterious.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that resistent rules about recycling of coal ashes might have a negative effect consumers due to the reason that they might think the products which have been produced by these ashes could be harmful, the speaker argues that this negative effects did not happen to other similar materials. She also adds that the merrcury which is recycled successfully by strict rules has a large number of consumers and the companies adopt to these rules well.
Finally, although the passage says that the new rules might augment the the costs of the companies, the professor disagrees by mentioning that it is true that the costs might be increased but she believes that this would be wellworthy. In addition, she states that by doing the calculation, the companies would be aware that the increasing of the price in the house would be 1 percent overally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich will be described in this report. First of all, the passage points out tha...
^^^
Line 5, column 419, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...cycled successfully by strict rules has a large number of consumers and the companies adopt to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...e number of consumers and the companies adopt to these rules well. Finally, although...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e says that the new rules might augment the the costs of the companies, the professor d...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e says that the new rules might augment the the costs of the companies, the professor d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09187279152 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56608153386 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519434628975 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7050210381 49.2860985944 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.1 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1 7.06452816374 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355400926972 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143617743746 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865920492198 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215984686027 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411021281987 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.