TPO48
Both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss the topic of the frog species declined due to the changes of environment. However, the speaker against with the agruments in the reading part. He advance several reasons to oppose the article.
First of all, frogs often harmed by pesticides. Although the writer states that pesticides used by farmers to prevent insects. These pesticides damage frog's skin and always destroy frog's habitats. Yet, this is very different from the lecturer's claim that it's not fair for farmers. When government start a strict regulation, farmers will lose their crop to competiting another farmer. Thus, the lecturer believes that pesticides is valuable for farmers.
Second, frog populations declined by fungus. Although the writer states that the skin of frogs will unable to absorb water, leading to dehydration. But the research show that it can be prevent with treatments. The lecturer holds a different viewpoint. According to that lecturer, treatments are cost a lot of money. Also, treatment have to use differently to each species of frogs. The treatments can not use again and agin in every generations. Therefore, the lecturer concludes that the treatment is too difficult for whole frogs species.
Third, the frog's habitats get destroyed by human activities. The lecturer disputes the writer's opinion that frog's environment threatened by draining of wetland and water use. The lecturer points out that the main reasons of damaged environment might contribute to global warming. Global warming leads frogs to be extinct. Hence, the lecturer holds that frogs may not stop getting damaged by protection from water development.
In summary, the lecturer thinks that the writer's points are not convincing. So, reading and listening contents are different.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships. 70
- In light of reasons mention above, I would deny the situation to face with my friends and classmate because i do not wants to lose my friend again and again. Therefore, I would highly recommend try to stay away from competition with friends. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family. So, there is no need for the government to help them. 60
- TPO48 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Competition between friends usually negatively impacts friendships. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... all, frogs often harmed by pesticides. Although the writer states that pesticides used ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd agin in every generations. Therefore, the lecturer concludes that the treatmen...
^^
Line 13, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...n activities. The lecturer disputes the writers opinion that frogs environment threaten...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46263345196 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70049787923 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569395017794 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 13.0662251656 184% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8116159795 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.9583333333 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7083333333 21.698381199 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.29166666667 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426492718908 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120959755909 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110732163107 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207311642998 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120780578047 0.0443174109184 273% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 53.8541721854 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.2 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.