young people reading far less literature and novels than they used to
The reading passage states that in modern age young people reading far less literature and novels than they used to. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article by less reading literature, the reading public is missing out on the benefits of worthful literature and be so null. In contrast, the professor contradicts the idea and further explains that today there are many high-quality materials beside of literature for reading such as science or history and etc, and it is wrong to think public reading is lack of benefits.
Second, the reading passage claims that many persons prefer to read web pages or watch a music video instead of sitting down with a challenging novel and trivial forms of entertainment have lowered the level of culture. In the same way, the speaker validates the idea and adds that this kind of thing happened in the daily life of modern peoples and accomplishment this activity is not in the poor level of culture.
Third, the author in the passage puts forward the idea that the writing, as well as the reading of literature, is likely to decline because of the poor standards of today' s readers. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that some times the modern writers prepare materials that are difficult to understand with complex language.
To sum up, the writer and speaker hold a conflicting view about reading the literature between young adults.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, well, in contrast, kind of, such as, as well as, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62952695887 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9981709795 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.777777778 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06452816374 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372844330235 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15275113909 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.21059953805 0.0662205650399 318% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208302418851 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180744185753 0.0443174109184 408% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.